Skip to content
-
Subscribe to our newsletter & never miss our best posts. Subscribe Now!
  • https://www.facebook.com/
  • https://twitter.com/
  • https://t.me/
  • https://www.instagram.com/
  • https://youtube.com/
Add Button Text
HARP - On This. . .

A Commercial Real Estate and Business Thought-board

HARP - On This. . .

A Commercial Real Estate and Business Thought-board

  • Home
  • About
  • Activate
  • Cart
  • Checkout
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Members
  • My account
  • Privacy Policy
  • Register
  • Shop
  • Site-Wide Activity
  • Terms of Use
  • White Papers
  • Home
  • About
  • Activate
  • Cart
  • Checkout
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Members
  • My account
  • Privacy Policy
  • Register
  • Shop
  • Site-Wide Activity
  • Terms of Use
  • White Papers
Subscribe
Close

Search

BusinessCommercial Real Estatelending

REAFFIRMED: LLC Members Do NOT Have Interest in LLC Property

By Kymn Harp
September 7, 2013 3 Min Read
0

Court Reaffirms that LLC Members Are Separate From the LLC and DO NOT Have An Ownership Interest In The LLC’s Property. Therefore Member Can File Lien.

http://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photo-confused-business-man-thinking-wich-way-to-go-image28551060Just a brief post regarding LLC Property:

On September 3, 2013, the Illinois Appellate Court for the Fifth District filed an opinion in the case of Peabody-Waterside Development, LLC v. Islands of Waterside, LLC, Regions Bank N.A., and Prairie Construction Management, LLC 2013 IL App (5th) 120490.

The Court’s Opinion is consistent with Illinois law related to limited liability companies (LLC). The fact that the trial court got it wrong and had to be reversed, however, is not entirely surprising. Experience demonstrates that many lawyers, and courts, either don’t understand the law related to the separateness of an LLC from its members, or refuse to believe it.

The law in Illinois is quite clear. Members of an LLC have no ownership interest in the property or business of the LLC. Members own an economic interest in the distributable cash flow (if any) from the LLC, but no interest in the property or business that generates that cash flow. The LLC Act is clear. The case-law is clear. Like it or not, this is the law in Illinois (and in virtually all USA jurisdictions).

business meetings of real estate brokers and company presidents

The issue arises when creditors try to collect judgments or other debts owed by members against assets of an LLC; when creditors try to pierce the entity veil without proving fraud; and in a variety of other circumstances.

In the Peabody-Waterside case, Peabody-Waterside was a 50% member of Islands of Waterside, LLC, and entered into an arm’s-length contract to provide construction services on land owned by Islands of Waterside, LLC. When Peabody-Waterside was not paid, it filed a mechanics lien against the property which, if enforceable, may result in a priority lien over the mortgage lien of Regions Bank.

Regions Bank defended by asserting that the mechanics lien was void because Peabody-Waterside was “jointly interested” in the property against which the mechanics lien was filed. [Under Illinois law, a co-owner of property cannot file a valid mechanics lien against the property because it is “jointly interested” in the property.] The trial court agreed, and found the mechanics lien to be void. Peabody-Waterside appealed.

On appeal, the Appellate Court correctly pointed out that “a limited liability company is a legal entity distinct from its members.” It also pointed out that “Illinois law clearly states . . . that membership in a limited liability company does not confer any ownership interest in the property, real or personal, of the LLC. 805 ILCS 180/30-1(a) (West 2008) (member of an LLC is not a co-owner of, and has no transferable interest in, property of a limited liability company). A member of an LLC owns only its membership interest in the LLC. . . . This is the reason why a creditor of an LLC member cannot seize LLC property to satisfy a member’s debt. The creditor can only attach the member’s distributional interest in the LLC because that is all the member owns. 805 ILCS 180/30-20(a)(West 2008).”

If you are a creditor, you need to understand this.If you are a debtor, this clear legal distinction provides some remarkable asset protection opportunities through use of LLCs.

Something to think about . . .

Thanks for listening.

Kymn

Share this:

  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • More
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Related

Tags:

#CREcommercial real estateenforcement actionslenderslendinglimited liability companyLLCLLC propertypropertyreal estateseparateness of ownershipsuitwhat to look for
Author

Kymn Harp

Kymn Harp is a solutions oriented commercial real estate and business attorney in Chicago, Illinois. Harp is a Shareholder in the Chicago office of Buchalter, APC, a full service law firm representing middle market businesses, business owners, commercial real estate investors and developers, banks, and wealthy individuals. Representing commercial real estate owners and developers and private sector businesses since 1978, Harp focuses on understanding his clients' precise business needs and then developing and implementing creative best practice solutions. Kymn (pronounced "Kim") is a frequent speaker at industry and bar related conferences, and an author of numerous articles on topics of interest to the commercial real estate industry and privately held business owners. He is the author of "ILLINOIS COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE - Due Diligence to Closing, w/Checklists", a book focused on due diligence and commercial real estate, available at Amazon.com and other online bookstores. Harp believes that in order to get what you want, you have to know what you want. You must employ due diligence in understanding the obstacles and opportunities presented, and in developing and executing a plan of action. There is no reliable shortcut to having a precise objective and an understanding of exactly how to achieve it.

Follow Me
Other Articles
Previous

The “little known” Two-Year Rule for Employment Restrictive Covenants – Illinois

Next

Dancing with Gorillas – Roulette – and CRE Litigation

No Comment! Be the first one.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright 2026 — HARP - On This. . .. All rights reserved. Blogsy WordPress Theme
Loading Comments...